Size the value on your own numbers
Add five numbers you already know, then choose how much sourcing you would run through FlockScore. Everything below is based on your figures, with the conservative case first.
How much of your sourcing would go through FlockScore?
Start small if you want. In many cases, one category is enough to cover the annual fee.
At 25%, FlockScore supports €4.5m of the spend you take to market, while monitoring all 600 suppliers.
Moves with the dial. You still run the sourcing events and negotiations. FlockScore helps you get credible alternatives on the table before the event starts.
Industry benchmarks put the cost of poor quality at 10 to 15% of operations, with around a fifth linked to suppliers. For you, that is roughly €840k. Around 40% of that sits with suppliers where our network is already seeing problems, giving €336k of addressable cost. We model a 15 to 35% reduction on that part only.
McKinsey estimates a month-plus disruption around every 3.7 years, with a prolonged production shock costing 30 to 50% of annual EBITDA. Applied to your figures, that is €486k to €811k of annualised exposure. Peer data can surface problems earlier and give you known alternatives when something fails. We model a 10 to 25% reduction.
- Share of external spend
- 0.9%Upper end: 2.2%. As a sense check, 1 to 2% of external spend is a normal result for a sourcing programme.
Take this away
Enter your work email and we send your figures, workings and sources as a PDF you can share internally.
How pricing works
Annual subscription, priced on the size of your supplier base and the features you need. Contributing your own supplier scorecards reduces the fee. We scope the exact figure with you on a call.
Book 30 minutesWhat the model is based on
The model uses your five figures, performance signals from manufacturers in our network, and six independent benchmarks: APQC, ASQ, McKinsey, Deloitte, Ardent Partners and peer-reviewed procurement research. Where a benchmark gives a range, we use the low end. Some value can overlap across the lines, so each is discounted rather than counted in full.
Sources
- CAPS Research (Arizona State and ISM): competitive events come in 10 to 20% below historical prices, and incumbents win only about half the events they are challenged in.
- Matilla-García and Vega, Applied Economics 57(40), 2025: each additional bidder lowers the price by 2.1%, and an open rather than restricted procedure by 9.9%.
- Ardent Partners: 44% of addressable spend actively sourced on average, around 60% for best in class, and 6 to 12% returned on each additional euro brought under management.
- ASQ: cost of poor quality typically 10 to 15% of operations.
- McKinsey Global Institute, Risk, resilience and rebalancing in global value chains: disruptions lasting a month or longer every 3.7 years, and a single prolonged production shock costing 30 to 50% of one year's EBITDA.
- Deloitte 2025 Global CPO Survey: 74% of CPOs put maintaining active alternative sources ahead of every other risk response. APQC Open Standards Benchmarking: median sourcing event takes 60 days end to end.